Kappersspullen.com shop kappersspullen kappersproducten wella goldwel kappersgigant uw online shop - Lanza Healing Smooth Glossifying Conditioner 250 ml Lanza Healing Smooth Glossifying Conditioner 250 ml

Lanza Healing Smooth Glossifying Conditioner 250 ml

In plaats van 21,95 EUR
19,76 EUR
Korting 10.00%
excl. 19 % Omzetbelasting excl.

10.00%

Artikelgegevens printen

Levertijd:

3-5 Dagen

Lanza Healing Smooth Glossifying Conditioner

Dit artikel hebben wij op zondag, 31. oktober 2010 in onze catalogus opgenomen.

Klantenrecencies:

Auteur: Gast 22.05.2012
Beoordeling:

peUOon , [url=http://ilfldgcjqdgs.com/]ilfldgcjqdgs[/url], [link=http://ldmwkbscwpbz.com/]ldmwkbscwpbz[/link], http://azbvqotkkupw.com/

Auteur: Gast 22.05.2012
Beoordeling:

Dear Eldar,but much of your comments I arverid to one thing, many are unhappy with the work, because he made certain remarks about the exact field that you all have passion towards.Then, you have missed my point what I said in the end of the review goes beyond physics. Let me try to explain Dr. Lanza basically says that observer determines objective reality around him/her and without observer no objective reality exists. Fine, let it be so, suppose this is an established fact that observer defines the world around him. How can I use this fact? Exploit it? What\'s there in this fact for us/me? How can a funding agency make money out of this fact? Sorry, maybe I am a bit practical.Second question is is there a practical way to make sure that Lanza\'s observation is indeed correct or wrong (or maybe it is correct just in a certain regime)? Unfortunately, answers to both sets of questions are absent in the book, and if you think a bit, you\'ll find that it is fundamentally impossible to get such answers out of the Lanza\'s idea. That\'s why I am saying that Dr. Lanza explains everything but predicts nothing.I am not sure why exactly a funding agency will want take its money out of string theory research and give it to Lanza especially taking into account that biotech is a huge bubble and capitalization of Advanced Cell Technology is tremendously overestimated as any careful study will show.Now what I\'m asking you is to put the physicist inside of you aside for a minute and remember the thought pattern that you were receiving while reading the book. Was there anything out of the ordinary that you yourself found appealing? confusing? out of the ordinary? perhaps scary? Hopefully this will help me develop a curiosity for his book further.Actually, I did not quite get why exactly you wanted me to put a physicist inside of me aside taking into account that 90% of Lanza\'s book is about physics. This blog is also about professional theoretical physics, and you may have guessed correctly, that I have more important and interesting things to do than writing a second review of Lanza\'s book. Also, I don\'t think that my audience will understand me But I tell you what if you are willing to buy my precious time at rate, say, about 70 USD/hour, then I am willing to explain you physics (quantum mechanics, special relativit, even general relativity), biology and philosophy behind Dr. Lanza\'s book in details, and at the level understandable for a newcomer.Cheers,Dmitry.

Auteur: Gast 22.05.2012
Beoordeling:

I apologize if I msised your point (end of the review) which went beyond physics. From what I understood from the paragraph above, I think you mean that even if we have agreed that objective reality only exists if there is an observer ?me and you? are yet to understand how we can use it in a practical way. Dmitry don?t get me wrong I think you were very honest when you expressed that. In a way I?m looking for the same answer that you are. How can this fact be used? How does this benefit me and you in our practical lives? From these series of questions you might help me understand the following:Since you read the book, does Dr. Lanza give ?ordinary people? or maybe even ?physicists? an advice on how we should implement this fact into our practical ways? If he doesn?t do you genuinely believe that he doesn?t know, or maybe he does and chose to avoid further comment on that matter?Even though you understand that Dr. Lanza is onto something, he himself doesn?t predict anything. Do you think he doesn?t predict anything because those predictions are very hard to test under a practical equation. Now do you think his objective point of view is actually transforming towards a subjective matter which will require a totally new way of thinking (perhaps a new science?).Ok here you going into funding. I also agree with you that we can?t completely stop the projects that we are funding now just to explore something somewhere else. I do think that Dr. Lanza have a very interesting point of view that does need further funding in order to explore the possibilities that I can?t completely grasp.Now regarding your next statement ?ACT is tremendously overestimated as any careful study will show?. Can you please advise me to where I can read or find these careful studies to make myself a bit more aware regarding that statement. I want to know exactly what you mean by ?capitalization of ACT is tremendously overestimated?. I stumbled upon your blog from different links and found it very interesting. Your review raised many questions in my mind. Yes I can admit to my ignorance in the field of physics and biology. I do see much opportunity to learn from an individual like you in order to be more aware and help myself understand the world that we are experiencing. With this knowledge we can make a better sense in the world that we live in, and probably develop a happier state of mind. I?m sorry I will decline your offer to explain fundamentals of these sciences for a charge. I?m however very interested in your point of view and would love to continue our discussion.

Auteur: Gast 21.05.2012
Beoordeling:

EcaMzB , [url=http://jstbwczyhkva.com/]jstbwczyhkva[/url], [link=http://ywjptjlgjymk.com/]ywjptjlgjymk[/link], http://kfjejrzffwiq.com/

Auteur: Gast 21.05.2012
Beoordeling:

TtFVXK sldkjexiaseg